CONSUMER CREDIT: Is a low home insurance rate always the best value? Rapid City Journal
When I opened our new escrow statement this week, I immediately looked at the total payment amount. I breathed a small sigh of relief when I saw that it was roughly the same as it had been before. Still, a closer look revealed that our hazard insurance premium was increasing. I whipped out my calculator and found that the increase amounted to an extra 15 percent.
I know it’s wise to get a new rate quote from competing insurance companies every year, but our insurance has become an expense we don’t tend to think about. We budget for it and record the automatic withdrawal in our checkbook register every month. Nevertheless, seeing an unexpected increase was enough to jolt me out of my complacency and remind me that we can’t assume we’re getting the best rate possible.
I dug out our policy statement and called our insurance agent the next day. He explained that the increase was caused by what he called “projections of future losses.” In other words, our home insurance premium was increasing so that our company could pay us (and other policy holders) in the event of widespread losses. He admitted we might be able to find a less expensive premium elsewhere, but he said we should consider the overall health of the company before we decided to make a switch.
![Should the Rich Pay for the Uninsured? New York Times]("http://nt1.ggpht.com/news/tbn/WT73Elu_3H4pbM/6.jpg")
Los Angeles TimesShould the Rich Pay for the Uninsured?New York TimesIf we let health care costs continue to expand at their baseline rate, that spending will bankrupt the economy even if we shut down the government health Barack Obama on Health-Care Reform: Trust Us.Smelling blood, Steele and RNC escalate assault on Obama's Obama derides 'tendency toward inertia'all 4,854 news articles »